Don’t think you have become mad Ms Wingsurf… Never in the world.

Explanation for ‘cracking the Google logic’: it does certainly not mean that you distroy something, although it may happen if you are not careful. A logic is the way something works, and to ‘crack’ a logic nothing but to make it work for yourself. Data do help in order to find the ‘weak’ point, may be used, either in order to destroy something, either in order to make it work for yourself, either in order to help avoiding possible catastrophes. To say: every system has weak points, and most of the systems finish by getting destroyed by the accidental (which is usually not that accidental but looks as if) finding of the weak point in question. Imagine thus, that there are people who deliberately are searching to destroy a system and just attack wildly and madly something because simply … ‘it is not theirs’. It was the case with France’s (probably copied or imitated) computer protection system in ‘Legifrance’. You can’t imagine how many devices were invented in order to destroy it, starting with repetition bombing of spam (legal in Holland in 2003) and negligeantly used in Germany. It could not be destroyed that way, but only accidentally (which means that the theft was probably also and only … accidental), but the accident could be produced by an error in defense system. If you know that, would you give the tip to everyone in order to have it finally distroyed or would you alert competent authorities in order to warn of this possibility? If you do the second, the French would never show any kind of recognition. I would simply give the tip further in order to teach manners to people. Honestly.

If though the same happens with Google, and I have the dark suspicion that these people are better mannered and will show some kind of recognition to the ecuadorian national effort to alert of possible error in system, would it not be better to alert them and win a powerful ally? At least this is my way of thinking.

To tell you the truth, solutions are almost always found the most incongruous ways you can imagine. The patching of stats on the screen does avoid confusion of categories as it seems to have intermediate even more powerful categories. Looks as if it were really necessary from time to time to become a plastic sheet in order to avoid emotional confusion! But, to reassure Ms Wingsurf, only a psychology that does already have the general solution to a deepest problem may have that brilliant idea excatly at the right moment. If you want thus to help Ms Wingsurf and Mr Dashtag to solve their affective problems, please patch statistics on your screen, as posts. It stabilizes the system. (Yes, both of them.) If you don’t follow advice, you will certainly not destroy the system, but have problems with sending messages. Warning!!

To say the truth, Sask, I don’t fall in love with satelites! But, soyouthinkican loved the idea so very much!