This poor, poor science without corresponding metaphysical frame needed really of some help, and not that much, to say the truth, for those who continued earning money through somewhat aleatory means, but both for the patients who had to suffer of these interventions, and the mothers, of whose more general wisdom were fed most of the sometimes quite evident results of this science.

Not only. It was much deeper as an approach, and perhaps the most intelligent way of revealing metaphysical frames and structures is the one consisting in the marginal explanation of abstract concepts while working on a concrete problem. The problems I was working at were mainly two, and both related.

The first was the relationship between literature and deep unconscious movements. These studies had started on the hypothesis that main characters of the OT and mythological works were ‘psychic characters” referrents, and not only historical characters, which they certainly were in a certain perspective. This association did open infinite doors to the understanding of main psychic logics through OT, Herodotus, Homer, classic Greek theatre and other myths (Nibelungen, Chanson de Roland, el Cid, Arthur – I just mention what I have studied, but it could be enlargened).

As literature though was quite holy a long time ago, submitted to constant popular intervention through the exposure of creation to a largest public, so that it was never a personal creation as such but the result of a general effort, it was difficult to see how modern literature may have the same role in a general pattern of understanding were the author was put beyond the clouds and only source of his creation. Works on the relationship between literature and deep psychic structures taking into consideration the pattern as given, result in extremely interesting views on history through the ‘decrypting’ of Dostoyevskij, read thus through other patterns of understanding, as are the Russian. The attempt to do the same with occidental literature seems to fail as literary creation is considered of the realm of ‘fantasy’ and ‘fantasy’ should not allow the relationship to reality, even less on more or less scientifical basis. To break this presumption, I write “Manual of a soldier” http://sonjakcheca.wordpress.com  and “Las Arenas de Eldorado” http://eldoradouno.wordpress.com, as products of fantasy. What may be the actual relationship to reality?

The deeper goal is though a second one: I consider the said of a psychic disturbed as a ‘creation’, not as a fantasy or as a disorder. If it is possible to establish a connection between the ‘creation’ and reality or the inner reality, it becomes possible to decode the functioning of the mentally ill and thus to find effective therapy. The mental illness that does most attract my attention is schizophrenia and later, accidentally, psychopathy.

Working on traditional means of detecting mental disorder and fighting against, I rationalize the functioning of these methods (mainly Spanish, Hebrew, Kurd and Chinese tradition), having as a result: “Clearing up refracted lines.” If you want it: http://ideabstracta.wordpress.com

The need of proof and comprehensive understanding of the phenomena of the unconscious do lead almost without plan to the creation of the referential model in https://sonjakasten1.wordpress.com. It is thus possible to get a general overview of how to consider the unconscious’ functioning if studying heavy psychic disturbance, as schizophrenia and psychopathy.